Queensland Economic Advocacy Solutions

header photo

2017-18 Federal Budget: Business Wishlist


According to business groups the 2017-18 Federal Budget should be one that stays the course on fiscal repair, builds on tax reform, doubles down on red tape reduction and invests in the next generation of infrastructure. I wholeheartedly agree with these but the political landscape and competing priorities in framing a Federal Budget makes it difficult to see one let alone all four being delivered. 

Treasurer Scott Morrison’s second Federal Budget to be delivered next Tuesday is a crucial one for the Coalition despite it coming only months after the last Federal Election. It will possibly determine the success or otherwise of this Government at the next election. No doubt it has been a problematic budget to frame for the Coalition as there are unprecedented tensions between seemingly mutually exclusive outcomes. In short it is hard for the Coalition to stay the course that the business community wants when arguably that course has been a large contributor to the Government’s lacklustre support in recent polls.

Furthermore it is difficult for the Government to maintain business community excitement when the Senate on the 31 March 2017 has already passed elements of the Coalition’s 10 Year Enterprise Tax Plan delivering tax relief for 3.2 million businesses with a turnover up to $50 million.  SMEs were the biggest winner from the last two budgets and it is tricky to keep doing new things to regenerate the positive vibe that SMES felt.  As of 1 July this year small businesses with turnovers of less $10 million will now have a company tax rate of 27.5 per cent. No doubt this initiative will be re-mentioned but in reality it has already been delivered.

In respect to businesses with a turnover greater than $50 million (that were jettisoned from the Enterprise Tax Plan Bill 2016 as a result of an impasse in the Senate) it will be difficult for the Coalition to prosecute the case for tax cuts to these companies as a result of a perception that it is pandering to Corporate Australia (a segment of the community that does not illicit much sympathy from the average voter at present). The net advantages of eroding the tax base in the short term to deliver an internationally competitive company tax rate of 25 per cent does not seem to fly with voters. This is a shame as modelling suggests a cut in the corporate tax rate to 25 per cent would generate a permanent increase in the level of GDP of just over 1 per cent and we are only part way to achieving this commendable outcome.

Frustratingly for the Coalition despite the 10 Year Enterprise Tax Plan and spending cuts, last year’s Federal Budget was ultimately viewed by the business community as a missed opportunity for holistic reform to the way we tax and spend.  At the same time it upset many in the broader community. Fixing the embedded budget deficit should be the highest priority but the Coalition has been unable to bring the broader public on the journey of this important challenge.

Support for budget repair needs to be bipartisan yet ‘politics of populism’ appears to be trumping the need to live within our means.  Whilst both sides agree something needs to be done it is how we fix the problem that is proving elusive.  Any fix is extremely difficult with over 50 per cent of the budget comprised in expenditure relating to social security, welfare and delivery of health services, no go areas for much of the community.  In short the 2017-18 Federal Budget needs to take action to reduce the deficit otherwise we burden future generations to either higher taxes or more severe austerity measures. Whether the Coalition puts this principle ahead of its own political fortunes will be fascinating to observe.

Finally it will be interesting to see whether the stoush between Queensland and the Coalition dissipates as a result of the Budget next week.  In short Queensland has arguably been short changed in infrastructure funding in recent years in comparison with other States.   However it is worth adding that this is largely as a result of our State’s steadfast refusal to recycle assets in order to access additional Commonwealth funding.  Recent comments particularly from the Prime Minister indicate that the Coalition’s hard line approach may be softening.

In closing I have provided below key recommendations that I believe should be included in the 2017-18 Federal Budget.

Go Back